🔴Illinois HB 3773IN EFFECTUp to ~$70K/violation|🔴Texas TRAIGA (HB 149)IN EFFECTAG-enforced|🔴Utah AI Policy ActIN EFFECT$2,500/violation|⚠️Colorado AI Act (SB 205)Jan 1, 2027AG-enforced|⚠️California SB 942Aug 2, 2026$5K/day|⚠️EU AI Act Art. 50Aug 2, 2026€35M or 7% revenue|⚠️New York RAISE ActJan 1, 2027AG civil penalties|🔴Illinois HB 3773IN EFFECTUp to ~$70K/violation|🔴Texas TRAIGA (HB 149)IN EFFECTAG-enforced|🔴Utah AI Policy ActIN EFFECT$2,500/violation|⚠️Colorado AI Act (SB 205)Jan 1, 2027AG-enforced|⚠️California SB 942Aug 2, 2026$5K/day|⚠️EU AI Act Art. 50Aug 2, 2026€35M or 7% revenue|⚠️New York RAISE ActJan 1, 2027AG civil penalties|
Last verified · Jul 11, 2026Sourced from official primary sourcesadmin.sc.gov.
Study PhaseDeadline: TBD
Flag of South Carolina

AI Laws in South Carolina (SC)

Governor's AI task force issued recommendations. Legislation expected 2027.

Map showing the location of South Carolina in the United States
South Carolina within the United States

What AI Task Force requires

South Carolina has enacted AI Task Force. Governor's AI task force issued recommendations. Legislation expected 2027. This page explains what the law requires in plain language, who is in scope, the penalty for non-compliance, and what your business needs to do.

Who is in scope

The law covers businesses that use AI to interact with consumers, make consumer-facing decisions (credit, pricing, recommendations, content delivery), or generate AI content that is presented to the public. Company size does not determine whether you are in scope — a startup with ten employees using an off-the-shelf AI hiring tool has the same disclosure obligations as an enterprise running a custom-built model. What matters is whether the AI system makes or substantially informs a decision that affects a South Carolina resident in a consequential way. Notably, the obligation extends to vendors: if your company deploys an AI tool built by a third party, you — as the deployer — are responsible for ensuring it meets South Carolina's requirements, even if you did not build it.

Key compliance requirements

South Carolina's consumer AI transparency requirements focus on two baseline obligations: disclosure and opt-out. Businesses must inform consumers when an AI system is involved in a consequential decision — meaning a decision that meaningfully affects a consumer's access to services, pricing, credit, or opportunities. The opt-out requirement gives consumers a mechanism to request human review or to decline AI-driven processing entirely. Meeting this standard is not just a notice-posting exercise: companies need to map every consumer-facing AI touchpoint, verify that their disclosure language is accurate and readable, and build a functioning human-review pathway that responds to opt-out requests within a defined window.

Penalties for non-compliance

South Carolina's AI law gives the state attorney general authority to investigate violations and seek civil relief. While statutory penalty amounts are still being finalized by implementing regulations, enforcement precedent from early AI cases in other states suggests regulators will prioritize companies with the widest reach and the most significant consumer impact. Consumer AI violations in South Carolina may also attract federal coordination: the FTC's Operation AI Comply sweep (September 2024) demonstrated that state and federal enforcers share intelligence on companies with widespread AI disclosure failures.

What to do now

Build your AI inventory first. You cannot comply with South Carolina's requirements if you do not know which systems are in scope. Map every AI or automated decision system your company uses that touches South Carolina residents — including third-party vendor tools integrated into your product.

Draft accurate disclosure language. Work with legal counsel to produce disclosure statements that accurately describe what your AI does, what data it uses, and what the consumer can do if they want human review. Vague or boilerplate disclosures will not satisfy South Carolina's requirements.

Build the opt-out pathway. Implement a functioning process for consumers to request human review or opt out of AI-assisted processing. Test it before the deadline — regulators will look for live, working mechanisms, not documented promises.

Assign a compliance owner. Designate someone — legal counsel, a privacy officer, or a dedicated AI governance lead — to track regulatory developments, own the audit documentation, and respond if an enforcement inquiry arrives. South Carolina's implementing regulations are expected to set precise compliance deadlines. Don't wait until the deadline to start.

South Carolina AI law in the broader regulatory landscape

South Carolina's law does not exist in isolation. The trend across the United States is toward more regulation, not less: at least 20 states enacted or proposed AI-specific legislation in 2025 alone, and federal enforcement agencies — the FTC, EEOC, CFPB, and HHS — have all issued guidance making clear that existing laws apply to AI systems even where no AI-specific statute exists. Companies doing business across state lines must track each state's requirements independently — there is no federal preemption that would allow a company to satisfy South Carolina's law and automatically comply with requirements in Illinois, Colorado, or New York.

✓ Free · No email · 2 minutes
Does your South Carolina business comply with AI laws?
Answer 4 quick questions → get your personalized risk score + action list.
Check My Risk — Free →
● Live

Recent AI law developments in South Carolina

Updated July 12, 2026

Recent news coverage of AI regulation and policy in South Carolina. Headlines are aggregated automatically; follow each link for the full story.

AI Law NewsFlag of South Carolina
WBTV
June 3, 2026
South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson calls for rules on AI political ads

Coverage from WBTV on AI legislation and regulation relevant to South Carolina.

WBTV·
Live · Legislature

AI bills moving through the South Carolina legislature

Updated July 11, 2026

AI-related bills currently tracked in the South Carolina legislature, updated automatically from Open States and the state legislature's own official record. Follow each link for the official bill text, sponsors, and status history.

S 896Chatbot Regulation

A BILL TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS SO AS TO ENACT THE "CHATBOT PROTECTION ACT"; AND BY ADDING CHAPTER 80 TO TITLE 39 SO AS TO PROVIDE RESTRICTIONS ON CERTAIN CHATBOT ACTIVITIES AND TO PROVIDE FOR CIVIL REMEDIES.

Committee report: Favorable with amendment Labor, Commerce and Industry

Open States·
S 788Artificial Intelligence and Therapy or Psychotherapy

A BILL TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS BY ADDING ARTICLE 5 TO CHAPTER 1, TITLE 40, SO AS TO PROVIDE DEFINITIONS RELATED TO ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THERAPY OR PSYCHOTHERAPY; TO PROVIDE THAT A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED TO USE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TO ASSIST IN PROVIDING SUPPLEMENTARY …

Referred to Committee on Medical, Military, Public and Municipal Affairs

Open States·
H 5476Protecting Children from Chatbots

A BILL TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS BY ENACTING THE "PROTECTING CHILDREN FROM CHATBOTS ACT" BY ADDING CHAPTER 81 TO TITLE 39 SO AS TO DEFINE TERMS RELATED TO CHAT BOT USAGE; TO PROVIDE THAT A COVERED ENTITY SHALL MAKE A LIMITED-ACCESS MODE OF A CHATBOT AVAILABLE AND VERIFY THE USER'S AGE; TO PROVIDE THAT…

Referred to Committee on Judiciary

Open States·
S 1037Protecting Children from Chatbots

A BILL TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS SO AS TO ENACT THE "PROTECTING CHILDREN FROM CHATBOTS ACT"; BY ADDING CHAPTER 81 TO TITLE 39, SO AS TO DEFINE TERMS RELATED TO CHATBOT USAGE; TO PROVIDE THAT A COVERED ENTITY SHALL MAKE A LIMITED-ACCESS MODE OF A CHATBOT AVAILABLE AND VERIFY THE USER'S AGE; TO PROVIDE …

Scrivener's error corrected

Open States·
S 963Artificial intelligence, consumer protection

A BILL TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS BY ENACTING THE "CONSUMER PROTECTIONS IN INTERACTIONS WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS ACT" BY ADDING CHAPTER 31 TO TITLE 37 SO AS TO, AMONG OTHER THINGS, PROHIBIT ALGORITHMIC DISCRIMINATION ARISING FROM THE USE OF HIGH-RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS.

Referred to Committee on Banking and Insurance

Open States·
H 5253Ai in education

A BILL TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS BY ADDING SECTION 59-28-195 SO AS TO ESTABLISH LIMITATIONS AND SAFEGUARDS GOVERNING THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS, TO REQUIRE PARENTAL NOTICE AND CONSENT, TO ENSURE HUMAN AND TEACHER OVERSIGHT, TO PROTECT STUDENT DATA, TO DEFINE TERMS, AND TO PRO…

Referred to Committee on Education and Public Works

Open States·
H 5085AI Week

A HOUSE RESOLUTION TO DECLARE MARCH 30 - APRIL 2, 2026, AS "AI WEEK" IN THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA AND TO ENCOURAGE ALL CITIZENS OF THE PALMETTO STATE TO LEARN MORE ABOUT THIS CRITICAL TECHNOLOGY.

Scrivener's error corrected

Open States·
H 5138Chatbot Regulation

A BILL TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS SO AS TO ENACT THE "CHATBOT PROTECTION ACT"; AND BY ADDING CHAPTER 80 TO TITLE 39 SO AS TO PROVIDE RESTRICTIONS ON CERTAIN CHATBOT ACTIVITIES AND TO PROVIDE FOR CIVIL ACTIONS.

Referred to Committee on Labor, Commerce and Industry

Open States·
H 4582Artificial Intelligence Electives

A BILL TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS BY ADDING SECTION 59-59-260 SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT EACH SCHOOL DISTRICT MAY PROVIDE AGE-APPROPRIATE INSTRUCTION TO STUDENTS ON HOW TO ACCESS, UTILIZE, AND CRITICALLY EVALUATE VARIOUS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS.

Referred to Committee on Education and Public Works

Open States·
S 28AI Child Abuse

Act No. 57

Open States·
S 443Health Claims & AI

A BILL TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS BY ADDING SECTION 38-59-23 SO AS TO REQUIRE A LICENSED PHYSICIAN TO SUPERVISE AND REVIEW HEALTHCARE COVERAGE DECISIONS DERIVED FROM THE USE OF AN AUTOMATED-DECISION MAKING TOOL.

Referred to Committee on Banking and Insurance

Open States·
H 3620AI Child Abuse

Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Schuessler

Open States·
S 225AI open sourced, decentralized

Referred to Committee on Labor, Commerce and Industry

Open States·
H 3517Deceptive and fraudulent deepfake media in elections

A BILL TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS BY ADDING SECTION 7-25-230 SO AS TO PROHIBIT THE DISTRIBUTION OF DECEPTIVE AND FRAUDULENT DEEPFAKE MEDIA OF A CANDIDATE WITHIN NINETY DAYS OF AN ELECTION UNLESS THE MEDIA INCLUDES REQUISITE DISCLOSURE LANGUAGE, AND TO AUTHORIZE A CANDIDATE WHOSE LIKENESS IS DEPICTED IN…

Referred to Committee on Judiciary

Open States·

Applicable laws

AI Task ForceTBD

↗ Each law links to its primary government source. Full source list below.

South Carolina AI compliance by industry

Healthcare
Finance & Banking
HR & Recruiting
Tech & SaaS
Marketing & Advertising
Insurance
Education
Legal Services
Real Estate
Retail & E-Commerce
Manufacturing
Transportation
Media & Entertainment
Nonprofit
Government Contractor

AI compliance by company size

Jump to top-risk sectors for your company size

Startups (1-10)
🏥 Healthcare
Small (11-50)
🏦 Finance
Mid-Market (51-500)
👥 HR & Recruiting
Enterprise (500+)
💻 Tech & SaaS

Quick resources for South Carolina

✅ Compliance checklist
💰 Fines & penalties
📋 Requirements
📖 Compliance guide
⏰ Deadlines

Industry risk levels in South Carolina

Risk by sector
🏥 HealthcareVery High
🏦 Finance & BankingVery High
💻 Tech & SaaSHigh
🛒 Retail & E-CommerceMedium-High
👔 HR & RecruitingVery High
⚖️ Legal ServicesHigh
📢 Marketing & AdvertisingMedium
🎓 EducationMedium-High
Risk levels based on South Carolina AI law requirements and industry-specific regulations

Do you also serve EU customers?

The EU AI Act applies to any company serving EU customers, even if you're based in South Carolina. Penalties reach €35M or 7% of global revenue. Deadline: August 2, 2026.

Check EU compliance →·GermanyFranceIreland

Other states with active AI laws

California
$5,000 per violation; each day is a discrete violation
Colorado
AG-enforced (Colorado Consumer Protection Act); up to ~$20,000 per violation
Illinois
IDHR/IHRC make-whole relief + tiered civil penalties up to ~$16,000–$70,000 per act per aggrieved party
Indiana
N/A (state-government governance)
Maine
Enforced as a violation of the Maine Unfair Trade Practices Act
Minnesota
Up to $7,500 per violation
Check your state's risk →

Related resources

Free AssessmentHealthcare AI LawsHR & Hiring AI LawsEU AI Act
Editorial standards

Anchored to the primary government source (statute, bill text, or agency rule) and verified directly against it · Last verified Jul 11, 2026. See our methodology.

Primary sources · South Carolina