How AI Law Tracker tracks and verifies the law
AI Law Tracker is written and edited by one person. This page explains who makes it, how the law is tracked and verified, what we claim, and — just as important — what we do not.
Who makes this
Every page is written and edited by Asım Ünlü, the site’s founder. There is no anonymous "editorial team" and no panel of paid experts, and we will not pretend otherwise. Asım is not a licensed attorney and never claims to be one.
How the law is tracked
Coverage is anchored to primary government sources first. Law pages are built from official statutes, bill text, and agency rules; live feeds are pulled directly from official APIs and registries (for example state legislatures via Open States, the EU’s EUR-Lex, Congress.gov, and national legislation portals) and then checked by a human before they shape a page.
- Automation is disclosed, not hidden: some drafting and the news/bill feeds are AI- and script-assisted. Nothing is published as raw machine output — claims are checked against the cited primary source.
- Automatically aggregated news headlines are labelled as such, and link out to the original publisher; they are background context, not a substitute for the primary law.
- Where a feed cannot be verified against a primary source, the curated, human-written law summary is what the page shows.
Source hierarchy & verification
When sources disagree, the primary government source wins. The order of trust is: the enacting government’s own text and trackers, then the regulator’s official guidance, then reputable secondary analysis. Every law page links to its primary source and shows a "last verified" date for when that source was last opened and confirmed.
Accuracy & corrections
We get things wrong sometimes — an outdated penalty figure, a mis-stated deadline, a mis-classified status. When an error is flagged we fix it and re-stamp the verification date. We only change that date when the content genuinely changes, never to fake freshness. The fastest way to reach a human is the contact page.
What we claim — and what we don’t
We claim to be an accurate, neutral, openly-sourced starting point for understanding AI law. We do not claim to give legal advice, predict how a court will rule, or replace a licensed attorney. Use the site to get oriented, then talk to qualified counsel before relying on any specific compliance decision.
Who writes this
Every page is written and edited by Asım Ünlü, the founder of AI Law Tracker. For the project’s independence and funding, see ownership & funding.