Underwriting AI and tech-E&O risk means knowing which AI laws bind a policyholder and what the statutory penalties are. AI Law Tracker turns that into a reproducible input for your models.
GET /v1/penalties— values are illustrative; the shape is the live API response.
curl "https://ai-law-tracker.com/api/v1/penalties?jurisdiction=eu-germany§or=hr-recruiting" \
-H "X-API-Key: alt_developer_…"{
"api_version": "v1",
"data": [
{
"law": "EU AI Act",
"jurisdiction": "Germany (EU)",
"layer": "country",
"penalty": "Up to €35M or 7% of global annual turnover",
"status": "In Effect",
"source_tier": "primary",
"source_url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai"
}
],
"meta": { "not_legal_advice": true }
}Full reference in the developer docs · paid tiers from $0/mo on pricing.
Yes. The 1–10 score is fully deterministic: the same applicant profile always produces the same score and the same named factors, with no language model involved. You can log the factor breakdown as part of your underwriting record.
Yes — /v1/penalties returns the maximum statutory penalty recorded for a jurisdiction/sector (for example, the EU AI Act’s up-to-€35M-or-7%-of-turnover cap), each linked to its primary source.
No. It is a reproducible data input for your models and workflow, not legal advice. Every record links to the primary source so counsel can verify before a coverage decision.
AI Law Tracker provides informational data, not legal advice. Verify every record against its official source before relying on it.