🔴Illinois HB 3773IN EFFECTUp to ~$70K/violation|🔴Texas TRAIGA (HB 149)IN EFFECTAG-enforced|🔴Utah AI Policy ActIN EFFECT$2,500/violation|⚠️Colorado AI Act (SB 205)Jan 1, 2027AG-enforced|⚠️California SB 942Aug 2, 2026$5K/day|⚠️EU AI Act Art. 50Aug 2, 2026€35M or 7% revenue|⚠️New York RAISE ActJan 1, 2027AG civil penalties|🔴Illinois HB 3773IN EFFECTUp to ~$70K/violation|🔴Texas TRAIGA (HB 149)IN EFFECTAG-enforced|🔴Utah AI Policy ActIN EFFECT$2,500/violation|⚠️Colorado AI Act (SB 205)Jan 1, 2027AG-enforced|⚠️California SB 942Aug 2, 2026$5K/day|⚠️EU AI Act Art. 50Aug 2, 2026€35M or 7% revenue|⚠️New York RAISE ActJan 1, 2027AG civil penalties|
Last verified · Jul 11, 2026Sourced from official primary sourceskslegislature.org.
Study PhaseDeadline: TBD
Flag of Kansas

AI Laws in Kansas (KS)

AI working group established within Governor's office. Policy recommendations pending.

Map showing the location of Kansas in the United States
Kansas within the United States

What AI Working Group requires

Kansas has enacted AI Working Group. AI working group established within Governor's office. Policy recommendations pending. This page explains what the law requires in plain language, who is in scope, the penalty for non-compliance, and what your business needs to do.

Who is in scope

The law covers businesses that use AI to interact with consumers, make consumer-facing decisions (credit, pricing, recommendations, content delivery), or generate AI content that is presented to the public. Company size does not determine whether you are in scope — a startup with ten employees using an off-the-shelf AI hiring tool has the same disclosure obligations as an enterprise running a custom-built model. What matters is whether the AI system makes or substantially informs a decision that affects a Kansas resident in a consequential way. Notably, the obligation extends to vendors: if your company deploys an AI tool built by a third party, you — as the deployer — are responsible for ensuring it meets Kansas's requirements, even if you did not build it.

Key compliance requirements

Kansas's consumer AI transparency requirements focus on two baseline obligations: disclosure and opt-out. Businesses must inform consumers when an AI system is involved in a consequential decision — meaning a decision that meaningfully affects a consumer's access to services, pricing, credit, or opportunities. The opt-out requirement gives consumers a mechanism to request human review or to decline AI-driven processing entirely. Meeting this standard is not just a notice-posting exercise: companies need to map every consumer-facing AI touchpoint, verify that their disclosure language is accurate and readable, and build a functioning human-review pathway that responds to opt-out requests within a defined window.

Penalties for non-compliance

Kansas's AI law gives the state attorney general authority to investigate violations and seek civil relief. While statutory penalty amounts are still being finalized by implementing regulations, enforcement precedent from early AI cases in other states suggests regulators will prioritize companies with the widest reach and the most significant consumer impact. Consumer AI violations in Kansas may also attract federal coordination: the FTC's Operation AI Comply sweep (September 2024) demonstrated that state and federal enforcers share intelligence on companies with widespread AI disclosure failures.

What to do now

Build your AI inventory first. You cannot comply with Kansas's requirements if you do not know which systems are in scope. Map every AI or automated decision system your company uses that touches Kansas residents — including third-party vendor tools integrated into your product.

Draft accurate disclosure language. Work with legal counsel to produce disclosure statements that accurately describe what your AI does, what data it uses, and what the consumer can do if they want human review. Vague or boilerplate disclosures will not satisfy Kansas's requirements.

Build the opt-out pathway. Implement a functioning process for consumers to request human review or opt out of AI-assisted processing. Test it before the deadline — regulators will look for live, working mechanisms, not documented promises.

Assign a compliance owner. Designate someone — legal counsel, a privacy officer, or a dedicated AI governance lead — to track regulatory developments, own the audit documentation, and respond if an enforcement inquiry arrives. Kansas's implementing regulations are expected to set precise compliance deadlines. Don't wait until the deadline to start.

Kansas AI law in the broader regulatory landscape

Kansas's law does not exist in isolation. The trend across the United States is toward more regulation, not less: at least 20 states enacted or proposed AI-specific legislation in 2025 alone, and federal enforcement agencies — the FTC, EEOC, CFPB, and HHS — have all issued guidance making clear that existing laws apply to AI systems even where no AI-specific statute exists. Companies doing business across state lines must track each state's requirements independently — there is no federal preemption that would allow a company to satisfy Kansas's law and automatically comply with requirements in Illinois, Colorado, or New York.

✓ Free · No email · 2 minutes
Does your Kansas business comply with AI laws?
Answer 4 quick questions → get your personalized risk score + action list.
Check My Risk — Free →
● Live

Recent AI law developments in Kansas

Updated July 12, 2026

Recent news coverage of AI regulation and policy in Kansas. Headlines are aggregated automatically; follow each link for the full story.

AI Law NewsFlag of Kansas
KSNT 27 News
July 10, 2026
State lawmakers warn against using AI to research Kansas laws

Coverage from KSNT 27 News on AI legislation and regulation relevant to Kansas.

KSNT 27 News·
AI Law NewsFlag of Kansas
Tampa Free Press
June 30, 2026
Florida, Arizona, And Kansas Lawmakers Launch Fight To Uncover AI Risks And Rewards For Seniors

Coverage from Tampa Free Press on AI legislation and regulation relevant to Kansas.

Tampa Free Press·
Live · Legislature

AI bills moving through the Kansas legislature

Updated July 11, 2026

AI-related bills currently tracked in the Kansas legislature, updated automatically from Open States and the state legislature's own official record. Follow each link for the official bill text, sponsors, and status history.

HB 2696Providing for the modernization of notarization and the notary public process with respect to real estate documents for the purpose of mitigation of real estate document-related fraud, requiring the development, implementation and administration of a two-tiered authentication system for notarization of real estate documents and requiring use of a 3D biometric antifraud system by all notaries public by December 31, 2027.

Died in Committee

Open States·
HB 2309Providing for the modernization of notarization and the county register of deeds process with respect to real estate documents for the purpose of mitigation of real estate document-related fraud, requiring the development, implementation and administration of a two-tiered authentication system for notarization of real estate documents, requiring use of a 3D biometric antifraud system by all notaries public by December 31, 2026, and allowing any register of deeds to delay filing of real estate documents in the event of suspected fraud for purpose of investigating of the validity of such document.

Died in Committee

Open States·
HB 2592Creating the Kansas task force on artificial intelligence and emerging technologies to study such technologies and make recommendations to the legislature.

Died

Open States·
SB 405Making it unlawful for a person to knowingly train artificial intelligence to encourage or support suicide or the unlawful killing of another person, provide emotional support, develop emotional relationships, act as a healthcare professional, simulate humans or encourage isolation.

Died

Open States·
HB 2313Senate Substitute for HB 2313 by Committee on Federal and State Affairs - Prohibiting the use of the artificial intelligence platform DeepSeek and other artificial intelligence platforms controlled by a country of concern on state-owned devices and on any state network and the use of genetic sequencers or operational software used for genetic analysis that is produced in a foreign adversary.

Signed by Governor

Open States·
SB 499Enacting the Kansas age-appropriate design code act to require businesses to assess and mitigate risks of compulsive use in minors, enacting the Kansas stopping likeness abuse by nonconsensual digital replicas act to create a private right of action for the unauthorized digital replication and distribution of individuals' digital likenesses and enacting the Kansas saving human connection act to prohibit deceptive practices and ensure transparency in chatbot interactions.

Died

Open States
HB 2671Establishing the Kansas community harmed by AI technology act, mandating user accounts and age verification for AI chatbot access, classifying users by age, requiring parental consent for minors, blocking explicit content, protecting age information confidentiality, monitoring for suicidal ideation, informing users of AI interaction, requiring compliance guidance by 2027, outlining enforcement under consumer protection laws and providing safe harbor for compliant entities.

Died

Open States
HB 2772Enacting the Kansas age-appropriate design code act to require businesses to assess and mitigate risks of compulsive use in minors; enacting the Kansas stopping likeness abuse by nonconsensual digital replicas act to create a private right of action for the unauthorized digital replication and distribution of individuals' digital likenesses; enacting the Kansas saving human connection act to prohibit deceptive practices and ensure transparency in chatbot interactions.

Died

Open States
HR 6023Opposing the federal preemption of state laws that regulate artificial intelligence .

Died

Open States
SB 467Enacting the use of artificial intelligence in medical decisions transparency act and requiring that all medical necessity determinations be made by a competent licensed physician or healthcare professional.

Died

Open States

Applicable laws

AI Working GroupTBD

↗ Each law links to its primary government source. Full source list below.

Kansas AI compliance by industry

Healthcare
Finance & Banking
HR & Recruiting
Tech & SaaS
Marketing & Advertising
Insurance
Education
Legal Services
Real Estate
Retail & E-Commerce
Manufacturing
Transportation
Media & Entertainment
Nonprofit
Government Contractor

AI compliance by company size

Jump to top-risk sectors for your company size

Startups (1-10)
🏥 Healthcare
Small (11-50)
🏦 Finance
Mid-Market (51-500)
👥 HR & Recruiting
Enterprise (500+)
💻 Tech & SaaS

Quick resources for Kansas

✅ Compliance checklist
💰 Fines & penalties
📋 Requirements
📖 Compliance guide
⏰ Deadlines

Industry risk levels in Kansas

Risk by sector
🏥 HealthcareVery High
🏦 Finance & BankingVery High
💻 Tech & SaaSHigh
🛒 Retail & E-CommerceMedium-High
👔 HR & RecruitingVery High
⚖️ Legal ServicesHigh
📢 Marketing & AdvertisingMedium
🎓 EducationMedium-High
Risk levels based on Kansas AI law requirements and industry-specific regulations

Do you also serve EU customers?

The EU AI Act applies to any company serving EU customers, even if you're based in Kansas. Penalties reach €35M or 7% of global revenue. Deadline: August 2, 2026.

Check EU compliance →·GermanyFranceIreland

Other states with active AI laws

California
$5,000 per violation; each day is a discrete violation
Colorado
AG-enforced (Colorado Consumer Protection Act); up to ~$20,000 per violation
Illinois
IDHR/IHRC make-whole relief + tiered civil penalties up to ~$16,000–$70,000 per act per aggrieved party
Indiana
N/A (state-government governance)
Maine
Enforced as a violation of the Maine Unfair Trade Practices Act
Minnesota
Up to $7,500 per violation
Check your state's risk →

Related resources

Free AssessmentHealthcare AI LawsHR & Hiring AI LawsEU AI Act
Editorial standards

Anchored to the primary government source (statute, bill text, or agency rule) and verified directly against it · Last verified Jul 11, 2026. See our methodology.

Primary sources · Kansas