🔴Illinois HB 3773IN EFFECTUp to ~$70K/violation|🔴Texas TRAIGA (HB 149)IN EFFECTAG-enforced|🔴Utah AI Policy ActIN EFFECT$2,500/violation|⚠️Colorado AI Act (SB 205)Jan 1, 2027AG-enforced|⚠️California SB 942Aug 2, 2026$5K/day|⚠️EU AI Act Art. 50Aug 2, 2026€35M or 7% revenue|⚠️New York RAISE ActJan 1, 2027AG civil penalties|🔴Illinois HB 3773IN EFFECTUp to ~$70K/violation|🔴Texas TRAIGA (HB 149)IN EFFECTAG-enforced|🔴Utah AI Policy ActIN EFFECT$2,500/violation|⚠️Colorado AI Act (SB 205)Jan 1, 2027AG-enforced|⚠️California SB 942Aug 2, 2026$5K/day|⚠️EU AI Act Art. 50Aug 2, 2026€35M or 7% revenue|⚠️New York RAISE ActJan 1, 2027AG civil penalties|
Last verified · Jul 11, 2026Sourced from official primary sourcesmca.legmt.gov.
In EffectDeadline: October 1, 2024
Flag of Montana

AI Laws in Montana (MT)

Montana's CDPA includes AI-driven profiling opt-out rights for consumers.

Map showing the location of Montana in the United States
Montana within the United States
⚠️
Maximum penalty: Up to $7,500 per violation
Non-compliance can result in significant fines for your business

What Consumer Data Privacy Act (AI provisions) requires

Montana has enacted Consumer Data Privacy Act (AI provisions). Montana's CDPA includes AI-driven profiling opt-out rights for consumers. This page explains what the law requires in plain language, who is in scope, the penalty for non-compliance, and what your business needs to do before the October 1, 2024 deadline.

Who is in scope

The law covers businesses that use AI to interact with consumers, make consumer-facing decisions (credit, pricing, recommendations, content delivery), or generate AI content that is presented to the public, and businesses that build consumer profiles, engage in targeted advertising, or use AI to draw inferences about individuals based on personal data collected in Montana. Company size does not determine whether you are in scope — a startup with ten employees using an off-the-shelf AI hiring tool has the same disclosure obligations as an enterprise running a custom-built model. What matters is whether the AI system makes or substantially informs a decision that affects a Montana resident in a consequential way. Notably, the obligation extends to vendors: if your company deploys an AI tool built by a third party, you — as the deployer — are responsible for ensuring it meets Montana's requirements, even if you did not build it.

Key compliance requirements

Montana's consumer AI transparency requirements focus on two baseline obligations: disclosure and opt-out. Businesses must inform consumers when an AI system is involved in a consequential decision — meaning a decision that meaningfully affects a consumer's access to services, pricing, credit, or opportunities. The opt-out requirement gives consumers a mechanism to request human review or to decline AI-driven processing entirely. Meeting this standard is not just a notice-posting exercise: companies need to map every consumer-facing AI touchpoint, verify that their disclosure language is accurate and readable, and build a functioning human-review pathway that responds to opt-out requests within a defined window.

Montana's privacy framework extends to AI-driven consumer profiling. Businesses using AI to build inferences about individuals — whether for targeted advertising, credit risk scoring, or behavioral segmentation — must provide clear disclosure of profiling activities and honor opt-out requests in a timely manner. Montana residents have the right to know what categories of data are being used, to access a summary of the profile built about them, and to request deletion. Companies that sell or license consumer profiles to third parties face additional obligations: they must contractually require downstream recipients to honor the same opt-out rights.

Penalties for non-compliance

The financial consequences of non-compliance under Consumer Data Privacy Act (AI provisions) are real and enforceable now. Montana sets a maximum civil penalty of Up to $7,500 per violation. Penalties accumulate per violation — meaning a company that has deployed an AI tool to thousands of consumers without required disclosures faces compounding exposure, not a single capped fine. Consumer AI violations in Montana may also attract federal coordination: the FTC's Operation AI Comply sweep (September 2024) demonstrated that state and federal enforcers share intelligence on companies with widespread AI disclosure failures.

What to do now

Build your AI inventory first. You cannot comply with Montana's requirements if you do not know which systems are in scope. Map every AI or automated decision system your company uses that touches Montana residents — including third-party vendor tools integrated into your product.

Draft accurate disclosure language. Work with legal counsel to produce disclosure statements that accurately describe what your AI does, what data it uses, and what the consumer can do if they want human review. Vague or boilerplate disclosures will not satisfy Montana's requirements.

Build the opt-out pathway. Implement a functioning process for consumers to request human review or opt out of AI-assisted processing. Test it before the deadline — regulators will look for live, working mechanisms, not documented promises.

Assign a compliance owner. Designate someone — legal counsel, a privacy officer, or a dedicated AI governance lead — to track regulatory developments, own the audit documentation, and respond if an enforcement inquiry arrives. The compliance deadline is October 1, 2024. Don't wait until the deadline to start.

Montana AI law in the broader regulatory landscape

Montana's law does not exist in isolation. The trend across the United States is toward more regulation, not less: at least 20 states enacted or proposed AI-specific legislation in 2025 alone, and federal enforcement agencies — the FTC, EEOC, CFPB, and HHS — have all issued guidance making clear that existing laws apply to AI systems even where no AI-specific statute exists. Companies doing business across state lines must track each state's requirements independently — there is no federal preemption that would allow a company to satisfy Montana's law and automatically comply with requirements in Illinois, Colorado, or New York.

✓ Free · No email · 2 minutes
Does your Montana business comply with AI laws?
Answer 4 quick questions → get your personalized risk score + action list.
Check My Risk — Free →
● Live

Recent AI law developments in Montana

Updated July 12, 2026

Recent news coverage of AI regulation and policy in Montana. Headlines are aggregated automatically; follow each link for the full story.

AI Law NewsFlag of Montana
KPAX News
June 22, 2026
City of Missoula looking to purchase security cameras with AI capabilities, but Montana law prohibits AI usage

Coverage from KPAX News on AI legislation and regulation relevant to Montana.

KPAX News·
Live · Legislature

AI bills moving through the Montana legislature

Updated July 11, 2026

AI-related bills currently tracked in the Montana legislature, updated automatically from Open States and the state legislature's own official record. Follow each link for the official bill text, sponsors, and status history.

LC 2720Revise artificial intelligence laws

(LC) Draft Died in Process

Open States·
LC 1795Revise artificial intelligence laws regarding elections

(LC) Draft Died in Process

Open States·
LC 2684Generally revise laws relating to AI

(LC) Draft Died in Process

Open States·
LC 3467Develop a framework for an AI powered learning environment

(LC) Draft Died in Process

Open States·
LC 3107Generally Revise laws related to AI

(LC) Draft Died in Process

Open States·
LC 1677Generally revise artificial intelligence laws

(LC) Draft Died in Process

Open States·
LC 1568Prohibit facial recognition attendance systems

(LC) Draft Died in Process

Open States·
LC 1336Revise laws related to facial recognition

(LC) Draft Died in Process

Open States·
LC 1312Prohibit facial recognition technology at traffic lights

(LC) Draft Died in Process

Open States·
SB 452Require disclosures of AI use by online media manufacturers

(S) Died in Process

Open States·
LC 3779Generally revise artificial intelligence laws

(LC) Draft Died in Process

Open States·
LC 3778Generally revise artificial intelligence laws

(LC) Draft Died in Process

Open States·
LC 3790Generally revise artificial intelligence laws

(LC) Draft Died in Process

Open States·
LC 845Establish artificial intelligence laws

(LC) Draft Died in Process

Open States·
LC 844Establish artificial intelligence laws

(LC) Draft Died in Process

Open States·
LC 832Revise facial recognition technology laws

(LC) Draft Died in Process

Open States·
LC 4006Generally revise artificial intelligence laws

(LC) Draft Died in Process

Open States·
LC 3989Generally revise artificial intelligence laws

(LC) Draft Died in Process

Open States·
LC 4290Revise artificial intelligence laws

(LC) Draft Died in Process

Open States·
LC 807Constitutional amendment on biometric data

(LC) Draft Died in Process

Open States·
LC 2143Generally revise AI laws

(LC) Draft Died in Process

Open States·
LC 3Providing for regulation of AI

(LC) Draft Died in Process

Open States·
LC 343Revise biometric information ownership laws

(LC) Draft Died in Process

Open States·
LC 344Constitutional referendum on the ownership of biometric data

(LC) Draft Died in Process

Open States·
LC 4278Generally revise education laws related to AI

(LC) Draft Died in Process

Open States·
HB 556Generally revise usage of artificial intelligence in certain health insurance

(H) Died in Process

Open States·
SB 413Criminalize disclosure of certain explicit AI-generated media

Chapter Number Assigned

Open States·
SB 25Revise election laws regarding disclosure requirements for the use of AI in elections

Chapter Number Assigned

Open States·
HB 178Limit government use of AI systems

Chapter Number Assigned

Open States·
SB 163Generally revise privacy laws related to biometric, genetic, and neural data

Chapter Number Assigned

Open States·
HJ 4Interim study of artificial intelligence

(S) Filed with Secretary of State

Open States·
SB 212Creating the Right to Compute Act and requiring shutdowns of AI controlled critical infrastructure

Chapter Number Assigned

Open States·
LC 68Require disclosures of AI use by online media manufacturers

(LC) Draft Ready for Delivery

Open States·
LC 1066Criminalize disclosure of certain explicit AI-generated media

(LC) Draft Delivered to Requester

Open States·
LC 3970Generally revise usage of artificial intelligence in certain health insurance

(LC) Draft Delivered to Requester

Open States·
LC 292Creating the Right to Compute Act and requiring shutdowns of AI controlled critical infrastructure

(LC) Draft in Assembly

Open States·
LC 5Generally revise privacy laws related to biometric, genetic, and neural data

(LC) Draft Ready for Delivery

Open States·
LC 1493Interim study of artificial intelligence

(LC) Draft Delivered to Requester

Open States·
LC 1339Limit government use of AI systems

(LC) Draft Delivered to Requester

Open States·

Applicable laws

Consumer Data Privacy Act (AI provisions)October 1, 2024

↗ Each law links to its primary government source. Full source list below.

Montana AI compliance by industry

Healthcare
Finance & Banking
HR & Recruiting
Tech & SaaS
Marketing & Advertising
Insurance
Education
Legal Services
Real Estate
Retail & E-Commerce
Manufacturing
Transportation
Media & Entertainment
Nonprofit
Government Contractor

AI compliance by company size

Jump to top-risk sectors for your company size

Startups (1-10)
🏥 Healthcare
Small (11-50)
🏦 Finance
Mid-Market (51-500)
👥 HR & Recruiting
Enterprise (500+)
💻 Tech & SaaS

Quick resources for Montana

✅ Compliance checklist
💰 Fines & penalties
📋 Requirements
📖 Compliance guide
⏰ Deadlines

Industry risk levels in Montana

Risk by sector
🏥 HealthcareVery High
🏦 Finance & BankingVery High
💻 Tech & SaaSHigh
🛒 Retail & E-CommerceMedium-High
👔 HR & RecruitingVery High
⚖️ Legal ServicesHigh
📢 Marketing & AdvertisingMedium
🎓 EducationMedium-High
Risk levels based on Montana AI law requirements and industry-specific regulations

Do you also serve EU customers?

The EU AI Act applies to any company serving EU customers, even if you're based in Montana. Penalties reach €35M or 7% of global revenue. Deadline: August 2, 2026.

Check EU compliance →·GermanyFranceIreland

Other states with active AI laws

California
$5,000 per violation; each day is a discrete violation
Colorado
AG-enforced (Colorado Consumer Protection Act); up to ~$20,000 per violation
Illinois
IDHR/IHRC make-whole relief + tiered civil penalties up to ~$16,000–$70,000 per act per aggrieved party
Indiana
N/A (state-government governance)
Maine
Enforced as a violation of the Maine Unfair Trade Practices Act
Minnesota
Up to $7,500 per violation
Check your state's risk →

Related resources

Free AssessmentHealthcare AI LawsHR & Hiring AI LawsEU AI Act
Editorial standards

Anchored to the primary government source (statute, bill text, or agency rule) and verified directly against it · Last verified Jul 11, 2026. See our methodology.

Primary sources · Montana