🔴Illinois HB 3773IN EFFECTUp to ~$70K/violation|🔴Texas TRAIGA (HB 149)IN EFFECTAG-enforced|🔴Utah AI Policy ActIN EFFECT$2,500/violation|⚠️Colorado AI Act (SB 205)Jan 1, 2027AG-enforced|⚠️California SB 942Aug 2, 2026$5K/day|⚠️EU AI Act Art. 50Aug 2, 2026€35M or 7% revenue|⚠️New York RAISE ActJan 1, 2027AG civil penalties|
European Union · EU AI ActIn Effect (14 January 2026) — framework act

Taiwan AI Law Deadlines

EU AI Act + GDPR + national-law dates that businesses serving this country must meet.

Deadline: In force on promulgation, 14 January 2026 (Art. 20); no compliance deadline for business — risk classification is delegated and not yet issuedPenalty: None. The Basic Act creates no offence and imposes no fine — verified against all 20 articles, which contain no penalty, sanction or criminal provision. Exposure runs through the Personal Data Protection Act and sector rules instead.

How AI law works in Taiwan

Taiwan's AI Basic Act (人工智慧基本法) was promulgated on 14 January 2026 and, under its own Article 20, took effect that same day. It is a framework statute rather than a compliance regime: 20 articles that bind the STATE rather than private deployers. Article 2 makes the National Science and Technology Council the central competent authority, with municipal and county governments competent locally, and leaves sector-specific matters to each sector regulator. Article 3 gives Taiwan a statutory definition of artificial intelligence — a system capable of autonomous operation which, through input or sensing and by means of machine learning and algorithms, produces predictions, content, recommendations or decisions that affect physical or virtual environments. Article 4 binds government AI policy to seven principles: sustainable development and well-being, human autonomy, privacy protection and data governance, security, transparency and explainability, fairness and non-discrimination, and accountability. Risk classification is delegated rather than set in the Act. Businesses should note what this Act does NOT do: it creates no offence, no regulator-imposed obligation on private AI deployers and no penalty of any kind — verified against all 20 articles, none of which contains a fine, penalty, criminal or sanction provision. Binding exposure in Taiwan therefore still runs through the Personal Data Protection Act and sector rules, with the delegated risk framework expected from the Ministry of Digital Affairs.

Applicable laws

  • 📜 Artificial Intelligence Basic Act (人工智慧基本法) — promulgated 14 January 2026

The EU AI Act enters into force and becomes enforceable on August 2, 2026 — a fixed, non-negotiable deadline applicable across all 27 EU member states and the EEA. This is not a deadline for planning or preparation; it is the date on which regulators and private parties can begin filing complaints, triggering investigations, and seeking penalties. Unlike GDPR, which had a 2-year grace period before enforcement (May 2016 adoption, May 2018 enforcement), the EU AI Act's enforcement timeline is compressed: the directive was adopted in December 2023, and enforcement begins August 2, 2026 — less than 20 months from adoption to active penalty risk. Businesses should treat August 2 as the same kind of hard cutoff as GDPR's May 25, 2018: compliance is required from day one, and non-compliance creates daily exposure.

Within the August 2, 2026 deadline, nested compliance deadlines apply to different system categories. Prohibited AI systems (facial recognition in law enforcement, social credit scoring, subliminal manipulation) cannot be deployed at all after August 2 — deployment is not a compliance violation, it is an immediate prohibited activity. High-risk systems must have completed conformity assessments (including bias and fairness testing) before August 2, must document human-review processes, and must implement transparency disclosures to affected individuals by the enforcement date. Limited-risk systems must provide transparency disclosures by August 2. Prohibited systems already in deployment must be removed by August 2. The deadline structure means a single non-compliance — one high-risk system without pre-deployment assessment, one prohibited system still in operation, one missing disclosure notice — creates measurable enforcement exposure on day one of the deadline.

National implementation and enforcement begin immediately on August 2, 2026. Each EU member state has designated a national AI authority responsible for complaint intake, investigation, and penalty assessment. In Taiwan, [National AI Authority details]. These authorities are staffed and equipped to begin enforcement on August 2 — they do not wait for national regulations to be finalized or enforcement guidance to be published. The first enforcement actions will likely target the highest-impact, most visible violations: prohibited systems still in operation, high-risk hiring systems without documented assessment, and chatbots that fail to disclose AI use. Smaller or less visible violations will be addressed through complaint-driven enforcement, but the baseline assumption should be that enforcement begins immediately.

The most urgent remediation timeline is now until August 2, 2026. Businesses should immediately: conduct a complete inventory of all AI systems, identify high-risk and prohibited systems, remove any prohibited systems from production, complete conformity assessments for high-risk systems, implement transparency disclosures, establish human-review processes, and document all compliance activities. For businesses with high-risk systems already in production, this timeline is extremely compressed — you must complete risk assessment, bias testing, and remediation of identified issues within months, not years. Attempting to compress months of work into weeks creates quality risk (assessment documents become rubber stamps, bias testing becomes superficial) that invites regulatory scrutiny.

After August 2, 2026, compliance obligations become ongoing and permanent. You must maintain conformity assessments for high-risk systems, re-assess annually, conduct bias re-testing after model updates, monitor human-review patterns and escalation rates, maintain audit logs, handle individual requests for explanation and appeal, and respond to regulatory inquiries. The deadline of August 2 is not the end of compliance work — it is the beginning of continuous compliance as a permanent operational function.

Taiwan AI law deadlines

Already in effect
⚠️ EU AI Act prohibited-practices ban + AI literacy obligations (Art. 4) since February 2, 2025.
Already in effect
GPAI obligations (general-purpose AI models) since August 2, 2025.
August 2, 2026
⚠️ EU AI Act high-risk-AI obligations bite — full conformity assessment, CE marking, and registration required for systems serving Taiwan users.
August 2, 2027
Final phase: high-risk AI embedded in regulated products covered by NLF legislation.
72 hours
Personal-data breach notification window under GDPR (notify the Taiwan DPA).
Annual
Refresh DPIAs and bias assessments; review the supervisory authority's latest guidance for Taiwan.

More Taiwan resources

AI Compliance Checklist💰 AI Law Fines & Penalties📋 AI Compliance Requirements📖 AI Compliance Guide← All Taiwan resources

Other countries

Germany (EU)France (EU)Netherlands (EU)Spain (EU)Italy (EU)Sweden (EU)
Editorial standards

Anchored to the primary government source (statute, bill text, or agency rule) and verified directly against it · Last verified Aug 31, 2026. See our methodology.

Primary sources · Taiwan
  • law.moj.gov.twhttps://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0160093
  • law.moj.gov.twhttps://law.moj.gov.tw/ENG/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0160093