A source-linked view of binding instruments, proposed measures, official policy and enforcement. Missing records remain visible as research debt rather than being treated as proof that nothing exists.
Official legislation/gazette surface reached at the first rung; substantive AI search and corpus ingestion are still required.
Historical sweep open: the 2015-present baseline is still measured research debt.
The Ombudsman states adequate normative AI regulation is not yet in place; the audit found the White Paper remained the roadmap rather than an enacted secondary regulation.
Historical sweep open: the 2015-present baseline is still measured research debt.
Official authority and court publication archives reviewed; no qualifying AI-specific matter was published.
Historical sweep open: the 2015-present baseline is still measured research debt.
No binding AI-specific instrument is currently held in our corpus. The historical source audit remains open unless the coverage card says the archive was fully measured.
No proposed AI-specific measure is currently held in our corpus.
No publish-ready AI enforcement matter is currently held. This is a corpus statement, not a claim that the country has never enforced an AI-related rule.