No LawAI Laws in Mississippi (MS)
No state-specific AI law. Federal laws apply. Monitoring federal AI Act developments.
What companies in Mississippi need to know about AI compliance
As of 2026-07-11, Mississippi has not enacted an AI-specific statute; the Mississippi Attorney General office defers to no comprehensive privacy statute; UDAP coverage via Miss. Code sec. 75-24-5. Operators across sectors in Mississippi watch federal signals first.
Mississippi's non-legislation on AI means the Mississippi Attorney General office has discretion to apply no comprehensive privacy statute to AI-driven consumer harms as they arise.
Three neighboring regimes create compounding exposure: Alabama (Executive Order on AI, penalty N/A (Executive)), Tennessee (ELVIS Act — AI Voice/Likeness, penalty Civil damages), and Louisiana (HB 312 — AI Transparency, penalty TBD). Multi-state Cross-Sector operators headquartered in Mississippi default to the strictest stack.
Federal law still governs Cross-Sector AI in Mississippi primarily through FTC Section 5 (15 USC 45) and NIST AI RMF 1.0. Adjacent federal authorities include Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) / NIST Cybersecurity Framework (15 U.S.C. § 6801-6809; NIST CSF 2.0); General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) (for EU users) (EU Regulation 2016/679); Section 508 / ADA Title III (Digital Accessibility) (29 U.S.C. § 794(d); 42 U.S.C. § 12181). Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) / NIST Cybersecurity Framework (enforced by Federal Trade Commission; NIST) applies to saas platforms handling personal/financial data via ai must implement nist csf security standards: identify, protect, detect, respond, recover. Penalty exposure: ftc civil penalties up to $100,000/violation; private litigation for data breaches. FTC Operation AI Comply (Sep 2024) targeted five companies across sectors.
The enforcement surface for Cross-Sector centres on FTC, CFPB, State Attorneys General, and the statute operators most often under-document is General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) (for EU users) (EU Regulation 2016/679) — a gap that surfaces in cross-sector FTC Section 5 exposure disputes. Build an evidence binder covering AI inventory, risk-tier register, incident-response runbook, and board-level AI risk report. Treat NIST AI RMF 1.0 (Jan 2023) is cited as the federal baseline across 30+ agency guidance documents as your leading indicator and escalate when the signal shifts.
The federal and neighboring-state framework that governs your AI operations. Cross-Sector operators in Mississippi operate under a federal-dominant framework anchored by FTC Section 5 (15 USC 45) and NIST AI RMF 1.0, with adjacent authorities Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) / NIST Cybersecurity Framework (15 U.S.C. § 6801-6809; NIST CSF 2.0); General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) (for EU users) (EU Regulation 2016/679); Section 508 / ADA Title III (Digital Accessibility) (29 U.S.C. § 794(d); 42 U.S.C. § 12181). FTC Operation AI Comply (Sep 2024) targeted five companies across sectors. The practical risk they have to price in is cross-sector FTC Section 5 exposure and state UDAP liability, and the bellwether signal to monitor is NIST AI RMF 1.0 (Jan 2023) is cited as the federal baseline across 30+ agency guidance documents. Alabama -- Executive Order on AI sets the de-facto regional floor. Mississippi has not enacted AI-specific legislation; regulators rely on existing consumer-protection and insurance authority. Use this as a starting point; sector pages on this site go deeper into industry-specific obligations.
With 11-50 employees you can justify a half-time compliance lead and part-time external counsel on retainer. Small-stage Cross-Sector operators should deploy a named compliance lead, formal AI inventory, quarterly bias spot-checks, and a documented escalation path, with semi-annual internal audit with annual external review and ownership resting with a designated AI compliance lead reporting to the CEO. small-business budgets ($50K-$250K) justify a compliance lead plus a GRC tool such as Credo AI, Fairly, or Holistic AI. For Cross-Sector specifically, the sharpest exposure to manage is cross-sector FTC Section 5 exposure and state UDAP liability. Given Mississippi's concentration in healthcare delivery, financial services, and hospitality, rural telehealth platforms and credit decision systems serving underbanked populations deserve priority in your AI inventory.
Verified 2026-07-11. See https://www.legislature.ms.gov/ for the Mississippi Attorney General public record on Mississippi AI policy.
No state AI law — but this federal framework still applies in Mississippi
Mississippi has not enacted its own AI-specific statute. That does not mean AI is unregulated here: the U.S. federal framework below is in force in Mississippi exactly as it is in every other state. Each authority links to its official government source. This is the cross-sector baseline — see the federal AI tracker for bills moving through Congress, and the industry pages below for sector-specific obligations.
Prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce. AI-generated marketing content that deceives consumers — synthetic testimonials, undisclosed AI-created imagery, deceptive personalization, dark patterns amplified by AI — is actionable under Section 5.
AI hiring and performance monitoring systems must accommodate individuals with disabilities. Must not eliminate essential job functions or require unnecessary testing.
AI credit and background check systems used in rental decisions must be transparent and non-discriminatory.
Voluntary framework organizing AI risk into Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage functions. A manufacturing-focused profile is under development. Framework is referenced in federal-contractor expectations and in agency best-practice guidance.
Recent AI law developments in Mississippi
Updated August 19, 2026Recent news coverage of AI regulation and policy in Mississippi. Headlines are aggregated automatically; follow each link for the full story.
Coverage from WXXV News 25 on AI legislation and regulation relevant to Mississippi.
Coverage from npr.org on AI legislation and regulation relevant to Mississippi.
Coverage from wcsufm.org on AI legislation and regulation relevant to Mississippi.
Coverage from tippahnews.com on AI legislation and regulation relevant to Mississippi.
Coverage from Mississippi Today on AI legislation and regulation relevant to Mississippi.
AI bills moving through the Mississippi legislature
Updated August 16, 2026AI-related bills currently tracked in the Mississippi legislature, updated automatically from Open States and the state legislature's own official record. Follow each link for the official bill text, sponsors, and status history.
Died On Calendar
Approved by Governor
Died In Committee
Died In Committee
Died In Committee
Died In Committee
Died In Committee
Died In Committee
Applicable laws
Mississippi AI compliance by industry
AI compliance by company size
Jump to top-risk sectors for your company size
Quick resources for Mississippi
Industry risk levels in Mississippi
Do you also serve EU customers?
The EU AI Act applies to any company serving EU customers, even if you're based in Mississippi. Penalties reach €35M or 7% of global revenue. Deadline: August 2, 2026.
Other states with active AI laws
Anchored to the primary government source (statute, bill text, or agency rule) and verified directly against it · Last verified Jul 11, 2026. See our methodology.
- ↗legislature.ms.govhttps://www.legislature.ms.gov/