In EffectMinnesota· Effective: In effect since July 31, 2025
Minn. Stat. ch. 325M

Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act (automated decisions / profiling)

By · Founder
Published Reviewed
Last verified · Jul 4, 2026Sourced from official primary sources — revisor.mn.gov ↗.

Lets consumers opt out of profiling and automated decisions that produce legal or similarly significant effects, question the result of a profiling decision, and requires controllers to complete data-protection assessments.

⚠️
Maximum penalty: Up to $7,500 per violation
Non-compliance can carry significant liability — verify against the official text below.
Bill / statute
Minn. Stat. ch. 325M
Jurisdiction
Minnesota
Status
In Effect
Effective / deadline
In effect since July 31, 2025
Maximum penalty
Up to $7,500 per violation

Who it affects

Businesses (controllers) that profile Minnesota consumers or use automated decisions with legal or significant effects.

Official source & full context

🏛️
Read the official text — revisor.mn.gov
Primary government source
📍
AI laws in Minnesota →
Full jurisdiction guide, live news & related bills

Other landmark AI laws

SB 942 — California AI Transparency Act
California · Enacted
SB 24-205 — Colorado AI Act
Colorado · Enacted
HB 149 — Texas Responsible AI Governance Act (TRAIGA)
Texas · In Effect
HB 3773 — Illinois AI in Employment Law (amends the Human Rights Act)
Illinois · In Effect
S6953B — New York RAISE Act (frontier-AI safety)
New York · Enacted — effective January 1, 2027
Local Law 144 — NYC Local Law 144 (automated employment decision tools)
New York City · In Effect
Browse all landmark AI bills →
Editorial standards

Anchored to the primary government source (statute, bill text, or agency rule) and verified directly against it · Last verified Jul 4, 2026. See our methodology.

Primary sources · Minn. Stat. ch. 325M — Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act (automated decisions / profiling)